SDxCentral
Join Log In
SD-WAN 4 5G 17 Edge 7 IoT 14 SDN 11 NFV 9 Containers 3 Cloud 13 Security 5 AI 8 Data Center Storage 1 APM/NPM 1 Open Source

Log In to SDxCentral

Log in with your email? Forgot your password?
  • Newsletters
  • eBriefs
  • Podcasts
  • Webinars
  • Videos
  • Directory
  • White Papers
  • Resources
  • Use Cases
  • Support

Join SDxCentral and get information tailored to your particular interests everyday.

Join
Sponsored:
Dell EMC 3 Citrix Riverbed

Google Dominates CNCF Code Commits, Stackalytics Says

Google Dominates CNCF Code Commits Stackalytics Says
Dan Meyer
Dan MeyerJanuary 18, 2019
1:42 pm MT
Email LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Reddit Hacker News

Google remains the dominate source of code contributions to Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) projects, accounting for more than half of all code commits, according to a new report from Mirantis’ Stackalytics.

Stackalytics’ numbers show that Google was the source of nearly 53 percent of all code commits, which was seven-times more than the second largest contributor, Red Hat. Treasure Data, which was acquired last year by Arm for $600 million, was No. 3 in terms of commits from a specific vendor, followed by CoreOS, which Red Hat acquired early last year for $250 million.

Google’s domination is not a huge surprise as many of CNCF’s largest projects were sourced from Google, with the most prominent being Kubernetes. However, the Stackalytics numbers showed that gPRC had the largest collection of Google commits. GPRC is an “incubating” project at CNCF that was developed by Google and donated to CNCF four years ago. Kubernetes had the second most Google-based commits, according to the Stackalytics numbers.

Boris Renski, co-founder and chief marketing officer at Mirantis, said that Google’s dominance was significant when compared to contributions from its rivals. Renski noted that Microsoft, which he said is “generally a good open source citizen,” contributed around 2 percent of the code to CNCF, primarily around Kubernetes and Helm. And Amazon posted only 27 commits total.

“This shows how dominant and how serious Google is about trying to win the cloud by leveraging open source,” Renski explained in an email. “Essentially, they are trying to do exactly the same thing with Azure and AWS as they did with iPhone when backing Android. Just like any phone manufacturer became Google’s friend in the battle against Apple, every hardware manufacturer will become Google’s friend in the battle with Amazon. It is not an accident that the first GKE on-premises service is specifically Kubernetes based.”

Stackalytics was originally started as an open source project at the OpenStack Foundation. It was initially focused on analyzing code commits to OpenStack projects, but has more recently began to look at CNCF projects and other independent open source projects like Istio, Spinnaker, and OpenShift.

Singularly Driven

The Stackalytics numbers also showed that many of the CNCF projects continue to be driven by a single contributor. For instance, it found that Treasure Data accounted for nearly half of all code commits to the FluentD logging platform; that Uber accounted for 64 percent of all commits to the Jaeger tracing project; and that Buoyant was the source for 84 percent of code commits to the Linkerd service mesh project.

“In fact, the only CNCF project with less than 40 percent dominance by a single vendor is Prometheus, originally built by SoundCloud, but in the last six months virtually exclusively maintained by independents – and Red Hat,” the report noted.

Analyst firm RedMonk found a similar disparity last year when it pulled numbers from GitHub for a blog post.

“This is not to say that this is a bad thing, it is not – it is just a statement of reality,” wrote Fintan Ryan, an analyst at RedMonk at that time. “While the broad community around the projects may be large, the number of significant core contributors is relatively small, and the number of truly independent contributors is smaller still.”

Chris Aniszczyk, COO at CNCF, said at that time that the organization sees this pattern as common for many of its projects when they start. “We look to guide our projects through a lifecycle and help them get to a sustainable level of collaboration and development,” he explained.

Aniszczyk added that CNCF does have the ability to “archive” or remove projects that lose traction or are no longer being used.

CNCF also has its own DevStats tool to track project commits and community interactions. A Mirantis spokesman noted that Stackalytics was looking to merge its insight with that from CNCF and other projects to provide a broader industry view on the source of code commits.

Related Articles

IBM’s Cloud Kubernetes Service Gains ‘Experimental Managed’ Knative Support
IBM’s Cloud Kubernetes Service Gains ‘Experimental Managed’ Knative Support
Containers in Telcos – Are We There Yet?
Containers in Telcos – Are We There Yet?
AT&T 5G Airship Plans Powered by Mirantis
AT&T 5G, Airship Plans Powered by Mirantis
Serverless and Knative Underline Cloud Native Evolution
Serverless and Knative Underline Cloud Native Evolution
Etcd Joins CNCF’s Growing Cache of Open Source Projects
Etcd Joins CNCF’s Growing Cache of Open Source Projects
Pivotal Picks Kubernetes Knative to Bust Serverless Siloes
Pivotal Picks Kubernetes, Knative to Bust Serverless Siloes
SDxCentral Daily News

Join your Peers! Subscribe to SDxCentral's Newsletter

Article Tags:

Breaking News CF Local Cloud Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) Containers Google Kubernetes Mirantis Open Source Red Hat

Dan Meyer

About Dan Meyer

Dan Meyer is a Senior Editor at SDxCentral, with a focus on containers, lifecycle service orchestration, cloud automation and DevOps. Dan has been covering the telecommunications space for more than 17 years. Prior to SDxCentral, Dan was Editor-In-Chief at RCR Wireless News.

Have a story? Have a News Tip?

Send it to SDxCentral editors as editors@sdxcentral.com.

Subscribe to Get the Daily News!

About SDxCentral

  • Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Work With Us
  • Editorial Team
  • Careers
  • Legal
  • Support

Engage With us

This material may not be copied, reproduced, or modified in whole or in part for any purpose except with express written permission from an authorized representative of SDxCentral, LLC. In addition to such written permission to copy, reproduce, or modify this document in whole or part, an acknowledgement of the authors of the document and all applicable portions of the copyright notice must be clearly referenced. All Rights Reserved.

© 2012-2019 SDxCentral, LLC, All Rights Reserved. SDNCentral™, the SDNCentral logo, SDxCentral™, SDxCentral logo, SDxNews™, SDxTech™, SDx™, the SDx logo, and DemoFriday™ are trademarks of SDxCentral, LLC in the U.S. and other countries.

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy